ADVERTISEMENT Top Stories Trump attack ambassador ‘has PM’s full support’
Downing Street says the UK’s ambassador to the US has the prime minister’s “full support”, regardless of Donald Trump saying he’ll not work with him.
The US president was responding after leaked emails revealed Sir Kim Darroch had known as his administration inept.
Ina sequence of tweets, Mr Trump additionally criticised Theresa May’s dealing with of Brexit saying she had created “a mess”.
Number 10 known as the leak “unfortunate” and mentioned the UK and US nonetheless shared a “special and enduring” relationship.
A Downing Street spokesman mentioned: “We have made clear to the US how unfortunate this leak is. The selective extracts leaked do not reflect the closeness of, and the esteem in which we hold, the relationship.”
But he mentioned ambassadors wanted to have the ability to present trustworthy assessments of the politics of their nation, and the prime minister stood by Sir Kim.
“The UK has a special and enduring relationship with the US based on our long history and commitment to shared values and that will continue to be the case,” he mentioned.
The Trump query confronted by the subsequent PM
Downing Street’s response is a classically formal “thanks, but no thanks”. A stiff brush-off in riposte to the US president’s digital tirade, which was extraordinary even by his requirements.
With the present prime minister virtually out of the door, and the UK ambassador in Washington leaving too, the remarks are unlikely to alter a lot immediately, and this enables Number 10 to attempt to shrug off the criticism.
Less formally, although, there’s actual frustration. One senior Tory warned that “we cannot bow down to this form of lunacy” the place the chief of one other nation tries to make use of on-line swagger to hunt revenge on one of many UK’s diplomats – not least from considered one of our most necessary allies.
Confidential emails from the UK’s ambassador,leaked to the Mail on Sunday,contained a string of criticisms of Mr Trump and his administration, describing the White House as “clumsy and inept”.
Sir Kim, who grew to become ambassador to the US in January 2016 a few yr earlier than Mr Trump took workplace, questioned whether or not this White House “will ever look competent” but in addition warned that the US president shouldn’t be written off.
The emails, relationship from 2017, mentioned rumours of “infighting and chaos” within the White House have been largely true and coverage on delicate points similar to Iran was “incoherent, chaotic”.
On Sunday the US president responded saying “we’re not big fans of that man and he has not served the UK well” however on Monday he escalated his response with a sequence of tweets criticising Mrs May and her dealing with of Brexit.
“What a mess she and her representatives have created,” the US president mentioned.
“I do not know the ambassador, but he is not liked or well thought of within the US. We will no longer deal with him.”
He mentioned that it was “good news” for the UK that it could quickly have a brand new prime minister.
The US state division declined to touch upon President Trump’s remarks, however the ambassador was disinvited from a dinner held on the White House on Monday night time for the Emir of Qatar.
BBC New York correspondent Nick Bryant mentioned Sir Kim was nonetheless planning to hitch International Trade Secretary Liam Fox for a scheduled assembly with the president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, until he’s rebuffed once more.
Is ambassador now ‘persona non grata’?
Analysis by James Landale, BBC diplomatic correspondent
By saying he will not cope with Sir Kim Darroch any extra, Donald Trump is seemingly all however declaring the ambassador to be persona non grata. That is the formal authorized course of by which a bunch authorities expels a international diplomat.
The key query now’s what the president means by the phrase “deal”. If the royal “we” utilized by Mr Trump implies that his total administration will not cope with Sir Kim or any of his employees then the British authorities might need to resolve to quick observe the retirement of their man in Washington.
Sir Kim, who’s an honourable man and was stepping down anyway in a number of months, might resolve to resign. If, nevertheless, Mr Trump merely means he will not deal personally with Sir Kim then the ambassador might keep on till the brand new prime minister could make his personal appointment.
This all presents the British authorities with a clumsy dilemma – to buckle below US strain and convey Sir Kim residence, risking accusations of abject weak spot, or to face agency and defend their ambassador for doing his job and telling the reality as he sees it, risking even additional harm to the UK-US relationship.
Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the international affairs committee, advised MPs he had made the request in a letter to the Met Police.
The authorities has already launched an inside inquiry.
Source:news.behealthyfornow.in